The Future is Equal

News & Media

Feeding Climate Change

The Paris Agreement marked a major breakthrough in support for climate action from many parts of the business community, including from key actors in the food and beverage sector. But despite significant progress, much work remains both to cut greenhouse gas emissions and to support the millions of people already hit by climate change.

This paper presents new data commissioned from the research consultancy CE Delft on the greenhouse gas emissions footprints and water scarcity footprints of major food commodities. The data demonstrate the vital role the food and beverage industry can and must play in turning the Paris Agreement into a springboard for the stronger climate action needed


Stars of the small screen

While female reality contestants in New Zealand try to win the heart of one expertly groomed male, on the other side of the world, in Tanzania, female TV contestants are busy planting, vaccinating goats and building mud storehouses to take the top spot as a Female Food Hero.

And it’s a hit. This year, it attracted 37 million viewers across Africa and America. In the past few years, it has spread from Tanzania to Ethiopia to Nigeria.

Advocacy and Campaigns Manager Eluka Kibon says Oxfam Tanzania wanted to celebrate and empower the female small-scale farmers who are the backbone of the food industry in the developing world.
 “No amount of sob stories would make these policy makers act, so we decided to do the opposite by creating this positive TV show through a national broadcasting station. They wanted less of a ‘pity party’ and more of a celebration that would give them the status they deserve,” she says.
At last count, 800 million people go to bed hungry each night and these people are typically from developing nations who rely on small-scale farmers. These farmers are typically women with small plots who have been excluded from access to credit, training, and technology.
The thinking was simple – given that women are vital in creating the world’s food basket, why not give them the tools and training to grow that basket?
As well as competing to win over the hearts and minds of judges and viewers, contestants get the chance to hear from The competitors learn more about the larger economy by visiting banks and food processing companies.
Since its launch in 2011, over a thousand people have taken part and 60 female food heroes have been crowned.  Each “hero” is given a cash prize ($15 – 6,000 NZD) to spend on agricultural goodies.
“They will often consult their community first. Some will buy big ticket items like tractors. Others will buy hoes.”
And although the show has opened doors into local leadership opportunities, you won’t find the winners carefully cultivating their Twitter audience.  “Some of these women have a Facebook or Instagram account though they aren’t plugged into Twitter or anything. They are often famed within their village and we’re hoping these effects will ripple out.”
To spread the word, Eluka says they have been targeting young, socially connected people to bridge the urban-rural divide and gain the ear of government officials. And so far, it’s been working.
“Old men and young people are most likely to watch the show. Perhaps that’s because it’s shown during dinner-time when women are cooking? Or the content is more appealing to men? We would like to do more testing to get some insights into how this is changing attitudes.”
Five years on and Eluka is still fizzing with ideas on how to grow the show and ensure it meets its goal of engendering change. “At the moment, it is still funded by the Gates Foundation and Oxfam Ireland, so in the next few years we’ll look to make it sustainable. Ultimately, we want to create legions of new female heroes – like education heroes, land heroes, women’s rights heroes – the possibilities are endless.”
Caption: Women take part in this televised competition to take the top spot as a Female Food Hero. Coco McCabe

Oxfam ready to respond as Cyclone Amos strengthens on approach to Samoa

Oxfam is on stand-by and ready to respond to Cyclone Amos, currently moving fast through the Pacific and bearing down on Samoa.

The cyclone, expected to impact in the early hours of tomorrow morning, is tracking towards the south-west of Samoa. Latest forecasts predict the storm will strengthen to a Category 4 Cyclone with destructive winds of more than 220km/h.

Oxfam are already prepositioned in Samoa to initiate water trucking and is working closely with its partners to act quickly, if required.

To support Oxfam’s emergency work donate to our Disaster Response Fund.

Donate now

Panama Papers scandal has overlooked the real victims

Panama-Papers-Opinion-Piece

This opinion piece by Oxfam New Zealand Executive Director Rachael Le Mesurier was published in The Christchurch Press.

OPINION: The Panama Papers leak blew the lid on worldwide tax avoidance. Many of the wealthiest companies and people have been systematically avoiding the taxes that the rest of us pay, and heads are starting to roll. But while the attention is focused on those who haven’t paid their taxes fairly – even if it has been legal – we’re missing the real scandal.

The names of Mossack Fonseca clients are in the news. The names of those most harmed by tax avoidance are not.

We live in a world where 57 million children are deprived of an education, Pacific Islanders have nowhere safe to shelter from the next extreme tropical cyclone, and one in every three of us doesn’t have a toilet – forcing those in poverty to see their loved ones die from something as easy to prevent as diarrhoea. A single lost life would be an outrage. But 2.2 million people dying globally from gastrointestinal infections each and every year is unconscionable.

As long as tax avoidance continues to drain government coffers the world over, there is a human cost. What pays for vital public services like hospitals, schools, water, and sewerage? Taxes. While New Zealand could clearly use the additional revenue we’re missing out on, it is the poorest countries that suffer the worst. Every year, they lose approximately US$170 billion from the often legal, but definitely unfair, use of offshore tax havens. Without that money, it’s impossible for developing countries to provide the basics many of us take for granted.

Malawi is a case in point. Despite rapid economic growth in recent years, the gap between rich and poor has widened at an alarming pace. Half of all Malawians live in poverty and the health system is chronically underfunded. With only three nurses for every 10,000 people, service is poor and waits are painfully long.

Action Aid found that just one Australian mining company – Paladin – cut US$43 million from its tax bill in Malawi through the use of tax havens. This money could have paid for 17,000 more nurses.

Looking wider, Oxfam’s research found that almost a third of rich Africans’ wealth is held offshore in tax havens. It is estimated that this costs African countries US$14 billion a year in lost tax revenue, which is enough to pay for healthcare that could save the lives of 4 million children and employ enough teachers to get every African child into school. These are not hypotheticals, or nice-to-haves, these are the realities of allowing tax avoidance to continue.

What’s the solution? Firstly, it’s time for the formation of an inclusive global tax body. This organisation would not only be responsible for standard setting, but must promote tax cooperation. To date, tax reform efforts have been driven by the OECD, but these 34 countries can’t simply set the rules and expect everyone else to agree. Developing countries have to have a seat at the table. They are the ones who are disproportionately affected.

Next is the establishment of public registers of the beneficial owners of all companies, foundations and trusts. Governments need to know who really owns and benefits from them in order to tax them accordingly. The New Zealand Government’s foreign trust review is a small start.

Finally, we must have transparency about where companies really make their profits and where they are paying their taxes. This would enable countries to fairly tax multinationals where their profits are. In tax jargon this is called country-by-country reporting, which would require multinational companies to publish their revenue and profits. It’s crucial that the information is public. If not, we as consumers and our governments won’t be able to hold multinationals to account for their tax practices – and developing countries won’t be able to scrutinise the global tax arrangements of companies operating in their territory.

In the Panama Papers fallout, a few figureheads will be sacrificed for dodgy financial dealings that are illegal, or at least immoral. But we can’t miss this opportunity for global, coordinated action to end tax havens. For decades, governments have said that they can’t solve this problem on their own, which was true. However in just the past year we’ve seen unprecedented global collaboration, with all countries committing to the new UN Sustainable Development Goals, followed up by the Paris Agreement on climate change.

Tax havens also demand a coordinated solution. We mustn’t let this moment slip through our fingers, while the Mossack Fonsecas of the world slip back into the shadows and continue their probably illegal, but definitely unfair, “services”.

Rachael Le Mesurier is the executive director of Oxfam New Zealand.